Android 下枚舉型使用、及與 int 轉(zhuǎn)換的困惑解答
在 C/C++ 環(huán)境下,已經(jīng)習(xí)慣使用枚舉型常量,但在 Android 下使用時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)枚舉與 C/C++ 下是完全不同的。
Android 下,枚舉其實(shí)是類(lèi)。
使用感覺(jué)困難,主要是枚舉與 int 之間的轉(zhuǎn)換。如果枚舉的定義如下 weekday 所示,還可以通過(guò) ordinal() 和 values()[] 方法進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)換。
但不幸的是,我使用的是如下 weekday_2 所示的枚舉類(lèi)型,我是沒(méi)有找到對(duì)應(yīng)的轉(zhuǎn)換方法。
最后沒(méi)有辦法,將枚舉修改為一般的常量定義,如下:
public?static?final?short?MAX_BUFFER_SIZE?=?2048;
public?class?Test?{
public?enum?weekday
{
????sun,
????mou,
????tue,
????thu,
????fri,
????sat,
????wed,
};
public?enum?weekday_2
{
????sun(0x1),
????mou(0x2),
????tue(0x3),
????thu(0x4),
????fri(0x5),
????sat(0x6),
????wed(0x7),
????large(0x99); //?如果增加此值,通過(guò)?ordinal()?方法得到的值是多少?
????private?int?iSet;
????weekday_2(int?iValue)?{
????????this.iSet?=?iValue;
????}
????public?int?Get()?{
????????return?this.iSet;
????}
};
}
對(duì)于上面兩個(gè)枚舉定義 weekday 和 weekday_2:
int?x?=?weekday.sun.ordinal(); weekday?sun?=?weekday.values()[x];
與
int?x?=?weekday_2.sun.ordinal(); weekday_2?sun?=?weekday_2.values()[x];
有什么差別?除了 weekday_2 中的 large 成員外,其它成員的值是否相同?
void?TestEnumValue()?{
TstEnum.weekday?day?=?TstEnum.weekday.sun;
TstEnum.weekday_2?day2?=?TstEnum.weekday_2.sun;
TstEnum.weekday_2?day2_large?=?TstEnum.weekday_2.large;
int?iDay?=?day.ordinal();
int?iDay2?=?day2.ordinal();
int?iDay2Large?=?day2_large.ordinal();
????System.out.println("Enum?Test"?+?"value?of?sun?:?"?+?Integer.toString(iDay)?+?"/"?+?Integer.toString(iDay2)
???? +?".?Large:?"?+?Integer.toString(iDay2Large));
}
執(zhí)行后輸出的結(jié)果是: Enum Testvalue of sun : 0/0. Large: 7
weekday_2 的成員 sun 并未輸出其真實(shí)的數(shù)值,而是輸出了下標(biāo)。
對(duì)應(yīng)之,weekday.values()[x]; 也是下標(biāo)。若知道 weekday_2 的一個(gè)變量值是: 整型 0x99, 想轉(zhuǎn)成對(duì)應(yīng)的枚舉。如果使用 weekday.values()[0x99] 則會(huì)直接越界。
(1) ?執(zhí)行:javac Test.java
編譯沒(méi)有出錯(cuò)即可。
(2) 執(zhí)行: javap Test
得到以下的輸出:
Compiled?from?"Test.java"
public?class?Test?{
??int?x;
??Test$weekday?sun;
??public?Test();
}
(3) 執(zhí)行: javap Test$weekday
得到以下輸出:
Compiled?from?"Test.java"
public?final?class?Test$weekday?extends?java.lang.Enum{
??public?static?final?Test$weekday?sun;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday?mou;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday?tue;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday?thu;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday?fri;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday?sat;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday?wed;
??public?static?Test$weekday[]?values();
??public?static?Test$weekday?valueOf(java.lang.String);
??static?{};
}
(4) 執(zhí)行: javap Test$weekday_2
得到以下輸出:
Compiled?from?"Test.java"
public?final?class?Test$weekday_2?extends?java.lang.Enum{
??public?static?final?Test$weekday_2?sun;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday_2?mou;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday_2?tue;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday_2?thu;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday_2?fri;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday_2?sat;
??public?static?final?Test$weekday_2?wed;
??public?static?Test$weekday_2[]?values();
??public?static?Test$weekday_2?valueOf(java.lang.String);
??public?int?Get();
??static?{};
}
從以上反編譯出來(lái)的代碼可以得出以下結(jié)論:?
(1) weekday 和 weekday_2 枚舉類(lèi)是final class,即不能被繼承,而它本身是繼承于 Enum
(2) 枚舉值是 weekday 或 weekday_2 對(duì)象,而且是 static final 修飾的





